The burial of these organisms also meant the burial of the carbon that they contained, leading to formation of our coal, oil and natural gas deposits. As the rate of C14 formation is independent from the levels of normal carbon, the drop in available C12 would not have reduced the rate of C14 production. Even if the rate of C14 formation had not increased after the Flood, there would have been a fundamental shift in the ratio towards a relatively higher radiocarbon content. The amount of C14 present in the pre-flood environment is also limited by the relatively short time less than years which had elapsed between Creation and the Flood. Even if one is generous and allows for the current rate of C14 production to have ocurred throughout this period, the maximum amount of C14 in existence then is less than a fourth of the amount present today. The last years have seen this effect occur in reverse. Our massive consumption of fossil fuels is releasing the carbon which has been locked up in the Earth’s crust for the last four or five millennia. The effect has been complicated by the addition of manmade radioactive carbon to the biosphere because of nuclear explosions and experimentation. And God said, Let there be a space in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the space, and divided the waters which [were] under the space from the waters which [were] above the space:
1. Rate of Decay
Edit By far, the most well-known type of radiometric dating is method using the radioactive isotope of carbon, carbon Every living organism on the planet contains the element carbon. Carbon’s most abundant and stable isotope has a mass of 12 six protons and six neutrons. However, there is also a neutron-rich radioactive isotope of carbon.
See this page in: Hungarian , Russian , Spanish People who ask about carbon 14C dating usually want to know about the radiometric  dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years. People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history. Clearly, such huge time periods cannot be fitted into the Bible without compromising what the Bible says about the goodness of God and the origin of sin, death and suffering —the reason Jesus came into the world See Six Days?
Christians , by definition, take the statements of Jesus Christ seriously. This only makes sense with a time-line beginning with the creation week thousands of years ago. It makes no sense at all if man appeared at the end of billions of years. We will deal with carbon dating first and then with the other dating methods. How the carbon clock works Carbon has unique properties that are essential for life on Earth.
One rare form has atoms that are 14 times as heavy as hydrogen atoms: Carbon is made when cosmic rays knock neutrons out of atomic nuclei in the upper atmosphere. These displaced neutrons, now moving fast, hit ordinary nitrogen 14N at lower altitudes, converting it into 14C.
Go Back Argon-Argon Dating and the Chicxulub Impact In the early s there was an intense controversy about the association of the Chicxulub Crater of the Mexican Yucatan Peninsula with the extinction of the dinosaurs in the period about 65 million years ago. The Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in the geological age scale was associated with an iridium-rich layer which suggested that the layer was caused by an impact with an extraterrestrial object. Because that time period, commonly referred to as the K-T boundary, was associated with the extinction of vast numbers of animals in the fossil record, much effort was devoted to dating it with potassium-argon and other methods of geochronology.
The time of 65 million years was associated with the K-T boundary from these studies.
Ultra-high-vacuum techniques have been incorporated in the argon extraction apparatus and in a new mass spectrometer especially designed for these researches. It is found that, because of these improvements, the radiogenic argon in small and young samples can be measured with precision. Analytical data for a group of rocks and mineral separates from the Yellowknife subprovince of the Canadian Shield are presented. Results show that micas retain more argon than feldspars and that orthoclase feldspars are more retentive than plagioclase feldspars.
Potassium-argon dates for biotites from the region are consistent and in good agreement with earlier age determinations, suggesting that biotite may retain radiogenic argon quantitatively. A very short time for emplacement of the Yellowknife granite series, ranging from hornblende-biotite diorite to muscovite granite, is inferred.
Doesn’t Carbon Dating Prove the Earth Is Old?
The method is based on the fact that the potassium isotope of potassium decays over time to form argon The useful fact about these two substances is that at normal temperatures, potassium is a solid, but argon is a gas. Therefore, during volcanic eruptions, any argon that is present escapes from the rock.
The isochron method Many radioactive dating methods are based on minute additions of daughter products to a rock or mineral in which a considerable amount of daughter-type isotopes already exists. These isotopes did not come from radioactive decay in the system but rather formed during the original creation of the elements. In this case, it is a big advantage to present the data in a form in which the abundance of both the parent and daughter isotopes are given with respect to the abundance of the initial background daughter.
The incremental additions of the daughter type can then be viewed in proportion to the abundance of parent atoms. In mathematical terms this is achieved as follows. This term, shown in Figure 1, is called the initial ratio. The slope is proportional to the geologic age of the system. In practice, the isochron approach has many inherent advantages.
When a single body of liquid rock crystallizes, parent and daughter elements may separate so that, once solid, the isotopic data would define a series of points, such as those shown as open circles designated R1, R2, R3 in Figure 1. With time each would then develop additional daughter abundances in proportion to the amount of parent present.
If a number of samples are analyzed and the results are shown to define a straight line within error, then a precise age is defined because this is only possible if each is a closed system and each has the same initial ratio and age.
Radiometric Dating – Types
But, carbon dating can’t be used to date either rocks or fossils. It is only useful for once-living things which still contain carbon, like flesh or bone or wood. Rocks and fossils, consisting only of inorganic minerals, cannot be dated by this scheme.
Gillaspy has taught health science at University of Phoenix and Ashford University and has a degree from Palmer College of Chiropractic. Radiometric dating is used to estimate the age of rocks and other objects based on the fixed decay rate of radioactive isotopes. Learn about half-life and how it is used in different dating methods, such as uranium-lead dating and radiocarbon dating, in this video lesson.
Radiometric Dating The aging process in human beings is easy to see. As we age, our hair turns gray, our skin wrinkles and our gait slows. However, rocks and other objects in nature do not give off such obvious clues about how long they have been around. So, we rely on radiometric dating to calculate their ages. Radiometric dating, or radioactive dating as it is sometimes called, is a method used to date rocks and other objects based on the known decay rate of radioactive isotopes.
Different methods of radiometric dating can be used to estimate the age of a variety of natural and even man-made materials. Radioactive Decay The methods work because radioactive elements are unstable, and they are always trying to move to a more stable state. So, they do this by giving off radiation. This process by which an unstable atomic nucleus loses energy by releasing radiation is called radioactive decay.
DOES RADIOMETRIC DATING WORK?
Part 2 – Potassium-argon dating and other Radioactive dating Methods Image Source Potassium -argon dating This method is very similar to radiocarbon dating. It is based on the decay of radioactive material into a non-radioactive substance at a fixed rate. The rate of radioactive potassium 40K into argon 40Ar can be measured since it is known that 40K has a half-life of 1. More specifically it is based on the rate at which potassium and radioactive argon change into stable argon gas.
These are K-Ar data obtained on glauconite, a potassium-bearing clay mineral that forms in some marine sediment. Woodmorappe fails to mention, however, that these data were obtained as part of a controlled experiment to test, on samples of known age, the applicability of the K-Ar method to glauconite and to illite, another clay mineral. He also neglects to mention that most of the 89 K-Ar ages reported in their study agree very well with the expected ages. Evernden and others 43 found that these clay minerals are extremely susceptible to argon loss when heated even slightly, such as occurs when sedimentary rocks are deeply buried.
As a result, glauconite is used for dating only with extreme caution. The ages from the Coast Range batholith in Alaska Table 2 are referenced by Woodmorappe to a report by Lanphere and others Whereas Lanphere and his colleagues referred to these two K-Ar ages of and million years, the ages are actually from another report and were obtained from samples collected at two localities in Canada, not Alaska. There is nothing wrong with these ages; they are consistent with the known geologic relations and represent the crystallization ages of the Canadian samples.
The Liberian example Table 2 is from a report by Dalrymple and others
Davy on the bellows at a public demonstration of science at the Royal Institution in London. Image by James Gillray. Sodium and then potassium reacting with water.
Debates between the rival factions aside, the formula for age estimate from K decay has to be modified because it decays by two modes. Therefore, the formula in Eq. The formula corresponds to the plot is in the form: One of the best known isotopic systems for isochron dating is the rubidium-strontium system as shown in Figure They are used for dating events e.
Table 01 below lists some radiometric systems and the range of dates that can be measured. The lower and upper limits are determined by the presence of enough number of the daughter and parent atoms to obtain sufficient signals. Ultimately it is the quality of the equipments in the laboratory, which impose the sensitive limit. Whereas the latter measures the diminished amount of the decaying material, optical dating relies on the accumulation of electrons trapped inside minerals such as quartz and feldspar the major composition of sediment.
The electrons come from the background radioactive elements in the solid, they are trapped in the crystal lattice in the absence of Sun light, which would set the dating clock back to zero by evicting the electrons from the sites.
How accurate are Carbon-14 and other radioactive dating methods?
The half-life of a radioisotope can be used to measure the age of things. The method is called radiodating. Radiodating can be used to measure the age of rocks see below and carbon dating can be used to date archaeological specimens.
Updated 10 November c Introduction In a related article on geologic ages Ages , we presented a chart with the various geologic eras and their ages. In a separate article Radiometric dating , we sketched in some technical detail how these dates are calculated using radiometric dating techniques. As we pointed out in these two articles, radiometric dates are based on known rates of radioactivity, a phenomenon that is rooted in fundamental laws of physics and follows simple mathematical formulas.
Dating schemes based on rates of radioactivity have been refined and scrutinized for several decades. The latest high-tech equipment permits reliable results to be obtained even with microscopic samples. Radiometric dating is self-checking, because the data after certain preliminary calculations are made are fitted to a straight line an “isochron” by means of standard linear regression methods of statistics. The slope of the line determines the date, and the closeness of fit is a measure of the statistical reliability of the resulting date.
Technical details on how these dates are calculated are given in Radiometric dating. Here is one example of an isochron, based on measurements of basaltic meteorites in this case the resulting date is 4. Reliability of radiometric dating So, are radiometric methods foolproof? Just how reliable are these dates? As with any experimental procedure in any field of science, these measurements are subject to certain “glitches” and “anomalies,” as noted in the literature.